Toxic Tort & Product Liability Quarterly Vol. 9, No. 3, August 2016

Toxic Tort & Product Liability Quarterly Vol. 9, No. 3, August 2016

Deferring to the role of a jury in resolving questions of competing scientific theories, a California appeals court upheld a trial court's ruling allowing expert testimony based on the “every exposure” theory, calling it “the subject of legitimate scientific debate.” See Davis v.